Nikita Mashtakov vs Cezar Cretu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the past six months, Mashtakov has outperformed Cretu in second serve points, with a success rate of 46.33% compared to Cretu's 39.2%. Could this serve reliability give Mashtakov an edge?
• In return games, both players have a slight advantage over each other in different aspects: Mashtakov edges Cretu on second serve returns (46.95% to 44.62%).
• When under pressure, Mashtakov has saved 53.75% of breakpoints, slightly more than Cretu's 50.73%. Does this resilience point to a psychological advantage?
• In the past year, Cretu has a substantially higher win rate at 66.22%, compared to Mashtakov's 53.33%—an indicator of consistency and performance.
• Surface preferences show Cretu is strongest on clay with a 70% win rate, while Mashtakov excels on hard courts with a 58% win rate. Does the surface type impact the probable outcome?
• Both players typically compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, but Cretu has a higher win rate (70% vs. 54.39%) suggesting better performance at this level.
• In their only direct encounter, Mashtakov emerged victorious, winning two out of the three sets played.
• When examining critical match points like break point conversion, Cretu slightly surpasses Mashtakov with a 39.39% conversion rate.
• Mashtakov has faced opponents with a lower average rank (343.3 vs. Cretu's 488.49), possibly pointing to tougher competition.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Cretu has a better track record, winning 48% compared to Mashtakov's 33% in the past year.

Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match presents an intriguing scenario where Cretu and Mashtakov bring their unique strengths and recent performances to the court. Cretu has a slight edge in overall match consistency over the last year, with a significantly higher win rate.

Mashtakov, however, shows stronger second serve and return stats, which might capitalize on potential weaknesses in Cretu's game plan. Additionally, Mashtakov's previous victory against Cretu and his higher pressure point resilience could play a crucial role in deciding the match.

Considering surface performance, Cretu's superior record on clay might work in his favor if the match is held on such a surface. Nonetheless, all factors considered, including head-to-head history and the propensity for handling high-pressure situations, Mashtakov seems more likely to clinch the upcoming encounter.